<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Tax Articles</title>
		<link>http://ml.csmccord.com/articles.html</link>
		<description>As tax professionals, we have authored or co-authored tax articles on a variety of topics.</description>
		<item>
			<title>Recommendation for Congressional Hearings on The Administration of the IRS Offer In Compromise Program</title>
			<link>http://ml.csmccord.com/'articles/ml-01.pdf</link>
			<description>A long-standing provision of the Internal Revenue Code has allows the IRS discretionary
				authority to compromise a tax liability ("OIC") for less than the full amount owed either for
				doubt as to liability or doubt as to collectibility. An IRS Policy Statement as recent as 1992
				places the IRS on record as supporting the OIC program. Congress signaled its support, if not
				a desire to broaden the offer in compromise program in the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act
				of 1998. Nevertheless, during recent years there is clearly a wide-spread perception among
				tax practitioners as well as the National Taxpayer Advocate which holds that the Service is
				less than committed to the OIC program and that technicians and managers responsible for
				administering the program appear to be operating under a directive to find ways to reject offers
				rather than look for ways to help get offers approved. Tax practitioners generally believe that
				the current Offer in Compromise program is administered today in a way which is inconsistent
				with clearly expressed Congressional policy which favors a liberalization of the Program.
				Accordingly, it is recommended that Congress conduct hearings at which Service
				representatives are called to testify and address the negative perceptions of the Program
				among tax practitioners and the public at large.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Extending Time for Informal Discovery</title>
			<link>http://ml.csmccord.com/'articles/ml-02.pdf</link>
			<description>In part as a result of the relative decline in the size of the inventory of
				the United States Tax Court, cases appear on trial calendars much more
				quickly than they have in years past.</description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
